Optimum Paint Sequence for Speckle Patterns in Digital Image Correlation
Experimental Techniques 41, 557-563 (2017)
Underlined names indicate AMDG researchers.
Archived copy: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21879990
Abstract
This note answers whether it is better to use black-on-white or white-on-black painted speckle patterns, and provides recommendations for optimum painted patterns for digital image correlation (DIC). Although DIC algorithms have no preference between tracking the patterns of either bright features or dark features on contrasting backgrounds, we show that paint sequence can be important due to fundamental differences in paint pigments. If the sample and experiment conditions call for two painting steps (basecoat and speckles), then applying a basecoat of white paint followed by black speckles is better than the converse. Black speckles are preferred because they increase contrast and provide a higher mean intensity gradient, lower correlation confidence interval, and lower displacement error. The primary reason for the increased contrast is the greater hiding power of black paint versus white paint. A secondary effect that also reduces contrast in white speckles is undertone, or a slight blue hue shift from Rayleigh scattering.
BibTeX
@article{2017_lepage_optimum_paint_sequence,
title = {Optimum Paint Sequence for Speckle Patterns in Digital Image Correlation},
author = {LePage W and Shaw JA and Daly SH},
journal = {Experimental Techniques},
volume = {41},
pages = {557-563},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1007/s40799-017-0192-3},
}Vancouver
LePage W, Shaw JA, Daly SH. Optimum Paint Sequence for Speckle Patterns in Digital Image Correlation. Exp Tech. 2017;41:557-563. doi:10.1007/s40799-017-0192-3
Version and rights
The file posted here is the accepted manuscript — the peer-reviewed text, before the publisher's copyediting and typesetting. Its content matches the version of record; its appearance does not. Please cite the version of record at the DOI above.
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature's AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-017-0192-3